Methane hydrate bottom-simulating reflectors (BSRs) are widespread on the northern Cascadia margin offshore Vancouver Island. We conducted a three-dimensional tomographic seismic study of the hydrate stability zone in an area around Ocean Drilling Program Site 889 using two deployments of five ocean bottom hydrophones and air gun shots along a series of closely spaced profiles in various orientations. Further constraints on reflector geometry come from coincident single-channel reflection profiles. Travel times of reflected and refracted phases were inverted with a regularized three-dimensional inversion using perturbation ray tracing through smooth isotropic media for the forward step. The seismic data allow us to constrain the velocity structure in a similar to 6 km(2) area around the drill site. Mean velocities range from 1.50 km s(-1) at the seabed to 1.84 km s(-1) at the BSR, and velocities at Site 889 match well those measured using a vertical seismic profile. At equivalent depths below the seafloor, velocities vary laterally by typically similar to 0.15 km s(-1). Close to the seafloor, velocities may be controlled primarily by lithology, but close to the BSR we infer hydrate contents of up to 15% of the pore space from effective medium modeling. The mean hydrate saturation in the well-constrained volume of the velocity model is estimated to be 2.2%. There is no correlation between the seismic velocity above the BSR and the reflection coefficient at the BSR, so the latter is likely controlled primarily by the distribution of free gas beneath the hydrate stability zone.
J. Geophys. Res.-Solid EarthISI Document Delivery No.: 967SPTimes Cited: 0Cited Reference Count: 32Cited References:CAMERLENGHI A, 1995, P OCEAN DRILLING P 1, V146, P3CHAND S, 2004, GEOPHYS J INT, V159, P573CHAPMAN NR, 2002, GEOPHYSICS, V67, P1038CLENNELL B, 1995, P ODP SCI RESULTS, V146, P201ECKER C, 2000, GEOPHYSICS, V65, P565FINK CR, 1999, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V104, P2909HOBRO JWD, 1998, GEOL SOC LOND SPEC P, V137, P133HOBRO JWD, 1999, THESIS U CAMBRIDGEHOBRO JWD, 2003, GEOPHYS J INT, V152, P79HYNDMAN RD, 1992, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V97, P6683HYNDMAN RD, 2001, AM GEOPHYSICAL UNION, V124, P273JAKOBSEN M, 2000, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V105, P561JARRARD RD, 1995, P OCEAN DRILL PROGRA, V146, P313JARRARD RD, 1997, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V24, P325KATZMAN R, 1994, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V99, P17975KOPF A, 1995, P ODP SCI RESULTS, V146, P117KORENAGA J, 1997, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V102, P15345LEE MW, 1996, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V101, P20347MACKAY ME, 1994, GEOLOGY, V22, P459MAVKO GT, 1998, ROCK PHYS HSB TOOLSPRIEST JA, 2005, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V110RIEDEL M, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V107RIEDEL M, 2005, IN PRESS GEOL SOC AMSINGH SC, 1993, SCIENCE, V260, P204SPENCE GD, 1995, P OC DRILL PROGR SCI, V146, P163TREHU AM, 2004, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V222, P845WESTBROOOK GK, P OCEAN DRILLING P 1, V146WOOD WT, 2002, NATURE, V420, P656YUAN J, 2000, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V27, P2397YUAN T, 1996, J GEOPHYS RES, V101, P13665YUAN T, 1999, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V104, P1179ZUHLSDORFF L, 2004, GEOLOGY, V32, P101B09102