The gravity inversion for the lunar crustal thickness needs three parameters: the crustal density, mantle density, and the reference radius of the crust-mantle boundary. The assumption of crust and mantle densities is found to significantly affect on the resultant crustal thickness variations. Moreover, the recent seismic analyses suggest the possibility of thinner crustal thickness around the Apollo 12 site than that proposed in the Apollo-era, on which the previous gravity inversions relied upon. Therefore the validity of the assumption used in previous gravity-inversion studies must be re-examined in detail. By using a simple three-layered mass model of the Moon including a uniform crust, mantle, and core, we determine possible combinations of the three parameters, satisfying the mass and moment of inertia constraints. The results show that the set of the parameters used in Neumann et al. (1996) can be consistent with mass and moment of inertia constraints, while those in Wieczorek and Phillips (1998) does not satisfy the constraints.
Earth Planets SpaceISI Document Delivery No.: 993WETimes Cited: 0Cited Reference Count: 21Cited References:ANDERSON DL, 1989, THEORY EARTHBINDER AB, 1998, SCIENCE, V281, P1475COHEN ER, 1987, REV MOD PHYS, V59, P1121GOINS NR, 1981, J GEOPHYS RES, V86, P5061KHAN A, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES, V107KONOPLIV AS, 1998, SCIENCE, V281, P1476KONOPLIV AS, 2001, ICARUS, V150, P1KUSKOV OL, 1995, GEOKHIMIYA, V12, P1683KUSKOV OL, 2002, PHYS EARTH PLANET IN, V134, P175LAWRENCE DJ, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES, V107LOGNONNE P, 2003, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V211, P27NAKAMURA Y, 1979, P LUN PLAN SCI C 10, P2299NAKAMURA Y, 1983, J GEOPHYS RES, V88, P677NEUMANN GA, 1996, J GEOPHYS RES-PLANET, V101, P16841NOZETTE S, 1994, SCIENCE, V266, P1835PAPIKE JJ, 1998, REV MINERALOGY, V36SMITH DE, 1997, J GEOPHYS RES, V102, P1519TOKSOZ MN, 1974, REV GEOPHYS SPACE PH, V12, P539WIECZOREK MA, 1998, J GEOPHYS RES-PLANET, V103, P1715WIECZOREK MA, 2003, PROS LUNAR PLANET SC, V34, P1330ZUBER MT, 1994, SCIENCE, V266, P1839