We analyse geodetically estimated deformation across the Nepal Himalaya in order to determine the geodetic rate of shortening between Southern Tibet and India, previously proposed to range from 12 to 21 mm y(-1). The dataset includes spirit-levelling data along a road going from the Indian to the Tibetan border across Central Nepal, data from the DORIS station on Everest, which has been analysed since 1993, GPS campaign measurements from surveys carried on between 1995 and 2001, as well as data from continuous GPS stations along a transect at the logitude of Kathmandu operated continuously since 1997. The GPS data were processed in International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2000 (ITRF2000), together with the data from 20 International GNSS Service (IGS) stations and then combined using quasi- observation combination analysis (QOCA). Finally, spatially complementary velocities at stations in Southern Tibet, initially determined in ITRF97, were expressed in ITRF2000. After analysing previous studies by different authors, we determined the pole of rotation of the Indian tectonic plate to be located in ITRF2000 at 51.409 +/- 1.560 degrees N and -10.915 +/- 5.556 degrees E, with an angular velocity of 0.483 +/- 0.015 degrees. Myr(-1). Internal deformation of India is found to be small, corresponding to less than about 2 mm yr(-1) of baseline change between Southern India and the Himalayan piedmont. Based on an elastic dislocation model of interseismic strain and taking into account the uncertainty on India plate motion, the mean convergence rate across Central and Eastern Nepal is estimated to 19 +/- 2.5 mm yr(-1), (at the 67% confidence level). The main himalayan thrust (MHT) fault was found to be locked from the surface to a depth of about 20 km over a width of about 115 km. In these regions, the model parameters are well constrained, thanks to the long and continuous time-series from the permanent GPS as well as DORIS data. Further west, a convergence rate of 13.4 +/- 5 mm yr(-1), as well as a fault zone, locked over 150 km, are proposed. The slight discrepancy between the geologically estimated deformation rate of 21 +/- 1.5 mm yr(-1) and the 19 +/- 2.5 mm yr(-1) geodetic rate in Central and Eastern Nepal, as well as the lower geodetic rate in Western Nepal compared to Eastern Nepal, places bounds on possible temporal variations of the pattern and rate of strain in the period between large earthquakes in this region.
J. GeodesyISI Document Delivery No.: 101FZ Times Cited: 53 Cited Reference Count: 67 Cited References: Willis P, 2006, J GEODESY, V79, P567, DOI 10.1007/s00190-005-0013-9 Beutler G, 2005, J GEODYN, V40, P414, DOI 10.1016/j.jog.2005.06.005 Willis P, 2005, J GEODESY, V79, P370, DOI 10.1007/s00190-005-0475-9 Schulte-Pelkum V, 2005, NATURE, V435, P1222, DOI 10.1038/nature03678 Willis P, 2005, CR GEOSCI, V337, P653, DOI 10.1016/j.crte.2005.03.002 Lave J, 2005, SCIENCE, V307, P1302, DOI 10.1126/science.1104804 Tavernier G, 2005, ADV SPACE RES-SERIES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.102 Bollinger L, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V109, DOI 10.1029/2003JB002911 Yoshioka S, 2004, PHYS EARTH PLANET IN, V146, P513, DOI 10.1016/j.pepi.2004.05.006 Tapley BD, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P503, DOI 10.1126/science.1099192 Willis P, 2004, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V31, DOI 10.1029/2004GL020038 Chen CZ, 2004, DOC OPHTHALMOL, V109, P1 Willis P, 2004, CR GEOSCI, V336, P839, DOI 10.1016/j.crte.2004.01.004 Jouanne F, 2004, GEOPHYS J INT, V157, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02180.x Williams SDP, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V109, DOI 10.1029/2003JB002741 Perfettini H, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V109, DOI 10.1029/2003JB002488 BOUCHER C, 2004, 31 IERS Ray J, 2004, GPS SOLUT, V8, P251, DOI 10.1007/s10291-004-0110-x Avouac JP, 2003, ADV GEOPHYS, V46, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2687(03)46001-9 SOCQUET A, 2003, THESIS U PARIS 11 Altamimi Z, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V107, DOI 10.1029/2001JB000561 Banerjee P, 2002, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V29, DOI 10.1029/2002GL015184 Sella GF, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V107, DOI 10.1029/2000JB000033 FLOUZAT M, 2002, EOS T AGU S, V83, pF366 Kumar S, 2001, SCIENCE, V294, P2328 Avouac JP, 2001, CR ACAD SCI II A, V333, P513 Vergne J, 2001, GEOPHYS J INT, V147, P155 Paul J, 2001, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V28, P647 BEUTLER G, 2001, BERNESE GPS SOFTWARE WESSEL P, 2001, GENERIC MAPPING TOOL Holt WE, 2000, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V105, P19185 Chen Z, 2000, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V105, P16215 Cattin R, 2000, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V105, P13389 Shen ZK, 2000, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V105, P5721 Lave J, 2000, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V105, P5735 Kreemer C, 2000, EARTH PLANETS SPACE, V52, P765 Pandey MR, 1999, J ASIAN EARTH SCI, V17, P703 Jouanne F, 1999, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V26, P1933 Soudarin L, 1999, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V26, P1207 Larson KM, 1999, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V104, P1077 Beutler G, 1999, ADV SPACE RES, V23, P631 Cohen SC, 1999, ADV GEOPHYS, V41, P133 BOUCHER C, 1999, 27 IERS PAR OBS Cretaux JF, 1998, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V103, P30167 Sillard P, 1998, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V25, P3223 Hauck ML, 1998, TECTONICS, V17, P481 Dong D, 1998, J GEODESY, V72, P200 Bilham R, 1998, CURR SCI INDIA, V74, P213 Fluck P, 1997, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V102, P20539 Zhang J, 1997, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V102, P18035 Gahalaut VK, 1997, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V24, P1011 Bilham R, 1997, NATURE, V386, P61 Nelson KD, 1996, SCIENCE, V274, P1684 PANDEY MR, 1995, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V22, P751 MERVART L, 1995, GEODATISCH GEOPHYSIK, V53 WEBB F, 1995, D11088 JPLM BLEWITT G, 1995, P IGS WORKSH IGS CEN, P31 DEMETS C, 1994, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V21, P2191 JACKSON M, 1994, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V99, P13897 ZHAO WJ, 1993, NATURE, V366, P557 SINGH SJ, 1993, J PHYS EARTH, V41, P87 OKADA Y, 1992, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V82, P1018 PRESS WH, 1992, NUMERICAL RECIPES AR ARGUS DF, 1991, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V18, P2039 MOLNAR P, 1989, P INDIAN AS-EARTH, V98, P61 WUBBENA G, 1985, P 1 INT S PREC POS G, P403 MELBOURNE WG, 1985, P 1 INT S PREC POS G, P373 Bettinelli, Pierre Avouac, Jean-Philippe Flouzat, Mireille Jouanne, Francois Bollinger, Laurent Willis, Pascal Chitrakar, Gyani Raja SPRINGER NEW YORK