Gavdos

 

GAVB 12618S001

 

IDS GAVB data should not be used. Not enough data

 

GAVB not in ITRF2005

 

GAVB velocity in ITRF2005 velocity field (EURA) is -17.20 19.07 11.44

GAVB velocity in ITRF2005 as computed from GPS data (1 year) is (in NEU) -23.86 2.97 -4.51, so we obtain 7.85 6.77 -22.16 (in XYZ). These 2 velocities are rather different, so we need to test these 2 hypothesis toward a GPS position expressed in 2007.5

 

Preliminary computations:

 

Hyp 1: using orignal ITRF2005 coordinates

 

Using the most recent DORIS weekly solutions (ign07d02) and fixing the velocity to ITRF2005, we obtain :

 

2007.5 GAVB 4783636.5096 2140697.6588 3623255.2870 -17.20 19.07 11.44

statistics GAVB XYZ 0.0036 0.0017 0.0032 131

 

Local tie with GPS (PGVB = GVD0)

PGVB GAVB 0.192 -14.351 9.009

 

So GPS coordinates (derived from DORIS results and using original ITRF2005 velocity would give)

 

2007.5 GVD0 4783636.3176 2140712.0098 3623246.2780 -17.20 19.07 11.44

 

Hyp. 2: using ITRF2005 velocities provided by Erricos Pavlis and expressed in ITRF2005

 

Using the most recent DORIS weekly solutions (ign07d02) and fixing the velocity to ITRF2005 as derived from 1 year of GPS data, we obtain

 

2007.5 GAVB 4783636.5443 2140697.6426 3623255.2428 7.85 6.77 -22.16

statistics GAVB XYZ 0.0010 0.0012 0.0019 131

 

We can see that the statistics are 3 times better than before (using original ITRF2005 velocity). This means that the velocity observed by DORIS is more consistent to the GPS velocity than to the ITRF2005 velocity field.

 

This can also be seend from the DORIS velocity estimates. Ign07d02 (position/velocity computed over the whole range of DORIS data provides): 7.12 11.89 -10.17, which is closer to the GPS-velocity estimation but quite different from ITRF2005 velocity field. This may be expected due to the complex geodynamics of the Mediterranea.

 

Using the geodetic local tie (GPS/DORIS), we can also compute GPS coordinates derived from DORIS data, using these velocities. We then obtain:

 

2007.5 GVD0 4783636.352 2140711.9936 3623246.2338 7.85 6.77 -22.16

statistics GVD0 XYZ 0.0010 0.0012 0.0019 131

 

 

Results provided by Erricos Pavlis are (in ITRF2005), the epoch of observation is 2007.5 (based on 1 year of GPS observations)

 

GVD0 @ 2007.5

4783636.3608 ±0.0007

2140712.018 ±0.0005

3623246.2188 ±0.0005

 

It is clear that Hyp 2 is much closer to the GPS results than Hyp. 1

 

We would then recommend using the DORIS coordinates derived from the DORIS data, using the GPS velocity (expressed in ITRF2005), using 1 year of data. We then obtain

 

2007.5 GAVB 4783636.5443 2140697.6426 3623255.2428 7.85 6.77 -22.16

 

so when extrapolating at epoch 2000.0, we have :

 

2000.0 GAVB 4783636.4855 2140697.5918 3623255.4090 7.85 6.77 -22.16

 

According  to the digital model of plate boundaries PB2002 proposed by Bird (2003), Gavdos, like Dionysos, is located on the Aegean Sea micro-plate. This model, which also proposes rotation velocity vectors of 14 plates and 38 micro-plates, gives the following velocity for GAVB: 4.39   9.52   -11.42 mm/yr (using NNR-N1A PCFC pole as PCFC is fixed in PB2002).

 

This is why it was not correct to use the ITRF2005 velocity field, assuming that GAVB was on the European plate.

 

Recommendation:

 

Estimate DORIS position adopting velocity from GPS ) + control with DORIS velocity

 

2000.0 GAVB 4783636.486 2140697.592 3623255.409 7.85 6.77 -22.16